Saturday, September 22, 2012

"Invictus" and the Captain of our fate

William Ernest Henley once wrote a poem around 1875 entitled "Invictus" after recovering from intensive surgery on his remaining foot (the other was amputated). The words to the famous poem are below:
Out of the night that covers me,
Black as the pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.

Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the Horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds and shall find me unafraid.

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll.
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.
Henley felt a sense of empowerment upon his recovering. Coupled with the reality of his impoverished childhood, the words of the poem flowed from his pen and expressed his feelings of control and autonomy from the powers of "whatever gods" that may exist, from the "Horror of the shade," from the "punishments [of] the scroll." The poem has been the source of inspiration to many undergoing hardships, again verbalizing the idea that we are the ultimate controllers and wielders of our fate.

There is a song by the band Brave Saint Saturn under the same name that sings quiet a different tune. Reese Roper, lead singer and author of the song, tells of the utter dependence that the Christian soul has on the one, true God. At nearly every point, BS2 counters Henley's poem with the biblical response of Christianity. See some of these parallelisms below.

  • While both begin with the idea of their current existence in darkness (Henley writes that "the night that covers me" is "black as the pit from pole to pole"; and Roper writes that what was once brilliant is now flickering cold and burning to ash, with the ideas of shadows and night present in the background), the two authors cope differently with their circumstances.
  • Henley's worldview consisted of a detached, lackluster acknowledgement of "whatever gods" that may be. His complete absence of the judgment to come and the "Horror of the shade" is unmistakable and only contributes to his own idea of autonomy from and supremacy to all external forces and powers around him, whether they be human or divine. Roper, however, is submissive to his belief in the great "Light of the world," to the one, unique, invincible, unbreakable, unstoppable King who is supreme over all of history, creation, and life.
  • Henley describes his soul as "unconquerable," not wincing or crying aloud when bad things befall him, nor bowing his head when he is a victim of tragic circumstance. On the other hand, Roper expresses that he is quite lost in his current situation, that he is guilty of harboring inflamed bitterness and that he is choking on his own pride. 
  • Henley is unafraid of both his past and his foreboding, ominous future. His reasoning is that he considers himself to be the "master of [his] fate" and the "captain of [his] soul." He is not threatened at all by the looming punishments of the scroll or even by the gods which he earlier thanks for his unconquerable soul. Roper, on the other hand, explains that his guilt leads to a brokenness of heart, to a repentance for what he has done to the great World Light, to the One who now parts the overhanging shadows, destroys his blindness, and establishes a government of eternal peace. With His reign comes a bright morning light that will never end. He is, to Roper, the "captain of [his] salvation" (Hebrews 2:10, King James Version).
In Henley's poem, the word "invictus," which literally means unconquerable or invincible, is a reference to himself. Roper's version of "Invictus," however, does not refer to his own invulnerability as Henley's did - rather, Roper both admits that he is quite vulnerable and beaten down and incapable of changing these circumstances, and acknowledges that it is Christ Jesus alone who is, in fact, invincible and unconquerable and able to bring him out of his tragic situation into His wonderful presence, where there is "fullness of joy" and "pleasures forevermore" (Psalm 16:11, ESV).

4 comments:

  1. Great comparison btwn William Henry and Reese Roper's Invictus. Alhtough Henry's poem is over 135 years old, I believe the majority of Americans today, and a surprising number of Christians, side with William Henry's Invictus. They believe that they control their own destiny, and give themselves way too much credit for the good things that happen in their lives, instead of acknowledging our helpless state and our utter dependency on Jesus.

    ReplyDelete
  2. But what about Osteen’s new book, I Declare: 31 Promises to Speak Over Your Life. Osteen's positive thinking theology shows that speaking declarations out loud can make them come true. Osteen promises that speaking positive words can bring positive results and warning that speaking negativity will bring negative results. “I don’t think there’s anything magic about it, but those words go out and come right back in and affect your own self-image.”

    In the book itself, Osteen asserts, “You’ve got to send your words out in the direction you want your life to go.”

    Osteen urges this is “activating faith,” because “faith is what causes God to work.” He even speaks of “speaking to the seeds of greatness that God’s placed in all of us.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous, I appreciate your input and am always glad to hear other's thoughts on these posts. I think that where I primarily differ with what you've quoted from Osteen above is that positive thinking and activating faith is not what merits or obliges God's blessings upon us - it is simply out of his gracious character that he shows us favor. This idea is epitomized in "sovereign grace" - that God freely and sovereignly gives of himself to his people without coercion or obligation. I love how this is explained by Moses in Deuteronomy 7:6-8 - that God was not coerced to choose Israel out of all the nations on earth to be his treasured possession. It was quite the contrary - "the LORD set his love on you and chose you...because the LORD loves you..." He loves you because it is simply in his character to do so. Further, Paul says that God has lavished us with the riches of his grace, not because we were positive thinkers, but because he redeemed us and forgave us of our sins in the atoning sacrifice of Christ on the cross (Ephesians 1:7). I hope this makes sense and that you are comforted by these truths as you read them in Scripture.

      Delete
  3. JS

    I appreciate your reply and am happy to know that you have probably spent much time mulling over how to reply to the post. There seems to be something "fake" about Osteen and I appreciate your theologically grounded analysis of the topics you speak of in your blog. Particularly how your statements and replies are grounded in the meat of scripture and not the fluff of emotion as I assume wells up from time to time.
    Thanks
    G&P

    ReplyDelete